CAM Patch Clinical Studies & Evidence

CLINICAL STUDIES

Head-to-Head Studies Validate Greater Diagnostic Yield of the CAM Patch

Head-to-Head Studies

Clinical proof is so important to BardyDx that it has led to three head-to-head studies.

CAM vs MCT

Continuous ECG monitoring versus mobile telemetry: A comparison of arrhythmia diagnostics in human- versus algorithmic-dependent systems.

Heart Rhythm O2 2021 ¹

CAM vs Zio

Comparison of two ambulatory patch ECG monitors: The benefit of the P-wave and the signal clarity.

American Heart Journal 2019 ²

CAM vs Holter

Comparison of diagnostic differences using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch w/a standard 3-lead Holter over 24 hours.

American Heart Journal 2017 ³

What healthcare professionals are saying

“The CAM has been an incredible step forward in rhythm monitoring for my patients and gives a much more reliable snapshot of arrhythmic risk“

-David Owens, M.D.

Additional Clinical Studies

P-wave centric patch monitors may reduce need for implantable monitors following cryptogenic stroke.

Circulation 2018 ⁴

A new sternal patch ambulatory ECG monitor differentiates outflow tract PVC from non-outflow tract PVCs.

European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society 2017 ⁵

Sinus arrhythmias: What’s behind the plot?

Journal of Electrocardiology 2017 ⁶

Atrial signal clarity and rhythm specificity are critical when using artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish atrial fibrillation (AF) from rhythms that mimic AF.

Heart Rhythm Society 2020 and Heart Rhythm Congress 2020 ⁷

Incidence of classic atrial flutter in outpatients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as identified with a new P-wave centric ECG monitor Implications for the AF ablation procedure.

International Atrial Fibrillation Symposium 2017 ⁸

Investigator Initiated Research Program

Baxter is committed to supporting investigator-initiated research efforts to expand the body of clinical evidence related to ambulatory cardiac monitoring. If you are a U.S.-based investigator and interested in the Baxter Investigator Initiated Research Program, please go to this link: Research & Continuing Education External Funding.

The Carnation Ambulatory Monitor is intended for ambulatory collection of ECG data. Rx Only. For safe and proper use of the products mentioned herein, please refer to the Instructions for Use.

Sources

Willcox M, Compton S, Bardy G. Continuous ECG monitoring versus mobile telemetry: A comparison of arrhythmia diagnostics in human- versus algorithmic-dependent systems. Heart Rhythm O2, 2021; 2:6:543-559.
Rho R, Vossler M, Blancher S, Poole JE. Comparison of two ambulatory patch ECG monitors: The benefit of the P-wave and the signal clarity. Am Heart J 2018; 203:109-117.
Smith WM, Riddell F, Madon M, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours. Am Heart J 2017; 185:67-73.
Collins J, Ortman M, Andriulli J, et al. P-Wave Centric Patch Monitors May Reduce Need for Implantable Monitors Following Cryptogenic Stroke. Circulation 2018; 138: A12894.
Rho R, Blancher S, McLendon K. A new sternal patch ambulatory ECG monitor differentiates outflow tract PVC from non-outflow tract PVCs. Poster presentation European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society 2017.
Rho R, McLendon K. Sinus arrhythmias: What’s behind the plot?. Journal of Electrocardiology 2017; 50:2:241-242.
Paris D, Boleyn R, Dreisbach E, et al. Atrial signal clarity and rhythm specificity are critical when using artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish atrial fibrillation (AF) from rhythms that mimic AF. Abstract and poster presentation Heart Rhythm Congress 2020.
Rho R, Blancher S, Vossler M, et al. Incidence of classic atrial flutter in outpatients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as identified with a new P-wave centric ECG monitor Implications for the AF ablation procedure. Poster presentation: International Atrial Fibrillation Symposium 2017.

US-FLC199-220022 (v4.0) 12/2024